Is Tiger Woods insane?
In biggest losers, In cheaters, In elin nordegren, In fail, In hollywood's ignored celebrities, In marital infedelity, In tiger woodsSaturday, February 20, 2010
Is Tiger sick?
If you play out some twisted sexual fantasy with one person you may be forgiven for following through on a God-awful judgment. Nobody's perfect so it's not people can beat you up for being perfect. But 10, 11 women? That's not poor judgment that's schizophrenia.
Better yet, that's multiple personality disorder, which is called dissociative identity disorder. At least one high-profile athlete has also come forward with it.
But does Tiger, who admittedly pulled himself together nicely for a dead-on apology, have it? How else to explain behavior that Hugh Hefner would find embarrassing?
People with dissociative identity disorder "display multiple distinct identities or personalities" each with its own pattern of perception, according to Wikipedia.
if you haven't notice, alter egos are big right now among celebrities. Perhaps the pressure from being the world's No. 1 golfer peeled the exterior from Tiger's pysche, creating in effect a new person, someone who could lurk in the shadows, someone who was, by all actions, single.
I'm not saying he's crazy, but I'm just saying.
In other words, people are saying, "Leave Tiger Alone"! and "Please, Leave him alone!"
Related Posts:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
there is nothing wrong with this man LOL
February 22, 2010 at 5:32 AMdo you know how many MEN have behaved like this that aren't rich? TONS and no one assigns them an unhealthy state of mind, they're just called dogs. I'm not personally calling Tiger Woods a dog but I certainly don't think that his sexual deviance in his marriage is any reason for the public to further entertain his life outside of golf. LOL
Good point. And Tiger, I think, would fit the dog category, but I think it's a bit deeper. He, and other politicians and even so-called 'celebrity' athletes fit another kind of profile.
February 22, 2010 at 9:16 AMhttp://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-psychopath-means
I read the attached article and according to what was stated there, I fit the description of a psychopath...and so do 99.9% of the people I know at any given moment.
February 22, 2010 at 1:12 PMHowever, I am NOT a psychopath. I laughed when I read this:
"Yet the scientific evidence for this intriguing conjecture is preliminary."
Because that sentence, simply put translates into:
This is all speculative opinion and beginners theory, not confirmed factual information.
I wonder how many people are actually going to pay attention to that sentence before heralding this article as an absolute truth.
Post a Comment