Check out Popwife.com

Toni Braxton has a 'Pulse'

Popwife.com's got VIDEOS

Lebron's Mom Did it. Yeah

Pages

Showing posts with label sex and relationships. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex and relationships. Show all posts

Diddy, J-Lo sex tape?

Thursday, February 4, 2010

If things couldn't get any more crazy for Diddy, there is a hint of possibility that there may be a Diddy-Jennifer Lopez sex tape out there somewhere, according to media reports.
J-Lo's ex says he can produce the tape, for a fee. Ojani Noa says that bringing Diddy into the Noa-Lopez catfight can strengthen NOa's argument that Lopez is basically a maneater.
We don't know if it's true, but if it is, then this tape could be as coveted as the unreleased songs Biggie Smalls is rumored to have created. This could be bigger than the mythic Dr. Dre album "Detox," which has been pushed back further than Sherman Hemsley's hair line.
No word on if Marc Anthony will then come out with his own remixed sex tape with J-Lo.

Politician: Virginity 'greatest gift you can give'

Thursday, January 28, 2010


Evidently, in Australia, a hman's virginity is not worth the breat he uses to acknowledge it. Not so though when it comes to women, according to off-center politician Tony Abbott.
Addressing a women's group, Abbot said he'd tell his own daughters that "the greatest gift that you can give someone" is your virginity.
He said the pureness, the innocence of it all would be in constrast to the blood, sweat and tears that a man gives.
Good thing Abbott was Down Under, and not in Chicago or Baltimore. That's the last thing young males need to hear is that their sperm is useless (of course, they already hear it , some for good reasons).
Of course there are those who say that what Abbott said was the truth and they see nothing wrong with it , but the fact that he prefaced his argument as if to say that male virginity was less sacred, not as much a big deal, well, that's unfortunate.

Heavy Petting on the 1st Date: Cool or Fool?

Wednesday, August 12, 2009


I gots to have it: That may be your mindframe when you first see a person or meet someone of interest initially.
When people go out on a date or get together for the first time, it's basically an interview. You can kick the tires, so to speak, but no test-driving.
But what happens when the touching goes too far, too quickly?
Hormones freak out, neurons connect to those familiar pleasure points in the brain; all those electronic signals the brain sends to the body can make things hot and heavy in the course of one night.
But is heavy petting cool on the first date? Obviously, we all know where it can lead and you (and/or the other person may not be up for that so quickly).
Then again, what's wrong with a little affection, right?
Heavy petting on Date No. 1: Cool or fool?

The No-Nookie Movement: Why Wait?

Monday, August 10, 2009


There's been a fast-spreading and unwritten rule that has taken hold in dating circles.
It's not by any means new, but it's so well embedded now that no one even thinks about why it's in place these days.
The No-Nookie Movement.
It's when women and men effectively put a timer on sex. They say "Well I have a 3 month rule" or "two-week" rule that they follow before having sex with a person.
Now, who came up with this is not as important as what its actual purpose is. The logic seems to be that you don't really know a person right off so you'll just take a few weeks, a few months, always a "specified" period to get to know the person.
Of course, in this world it's mandatory that you know who you're sleeping with since your genitals will fall off if you don't.
But my only point is that the No-Nookie Movement, with a specified date, kind of defeats the purpose.
Example: If I KNOW that a safe with $1 million automatically unlocks in six days, and I'm on Day 2, then I'm going to chill until DAY 5.7!
If I KNOW without a doubt that I can access a cookie jar at midnight and only at midnight -- that's the specified time --- then all I have to do is put myself on cruise control until 11:55ish, and I'm GOOD.
The NNM would work sooo much better if there was no specified time. Then it would be honest, genuine (kind o' like the Second Coming, you don't know when, but you know you'd better be right?) and you couldn't cheat.
See, if you tell somebody you really like "I have a waiting period. There's no timeframe attached to it, it's basically up to me and my comfortability" then ya gotta respect that, right?
Face it, most of these relationships end with "I thought I knew him..." anyway, right? But if you basically 'assign' a motive (wait for nookie to become available at "..." time) then you can't be mad when he operates on that.
But if you say, "These brownies will be ready at 3 p.m. ..." Get it?

Women and the Viagra Conundrum

Monday, March 9, 2009


In the movie "The Matrix," Morpheus ("Fish") asks a bewildered Neo (Keanu Reeves) if he'll choose the red pill, or the blue pill.
Women are apparently taking the latter.
Seems Viagra, a pill marketing to elderly men with erectile dysfunction, helps women with their libido. But let's clarify: It helps women on antidepressants with their libido. Why the distinction?
Because women on antidepressants commonly experience a lack of sex drive, or just don't want to do it.
Of course, Pfizer, who makes Viagra, has searched long and hard (no pun intended) for a female Viagra to add to its billions but the devil has been in the details. A main feature of the drug is that it blocks an enzyme that restrains blood flow, which, for men, is good because it lets more blood flow to the penis. In women, the drug increased engorgement of genital tissue, which meant that it got puffy "down there," but didn't add anything sexually.
In a 2008 study, 72% of depressed women taking Viagra, and 27% of depressed women taking a placebo, reported improvement in sexual arousal.
While Pfizer takes this as a win, they don't seem to realize that the women they studied all had sexual problems not because they don't necessarily like sex, but because they were on antidepressants.

Instead of trying to get the women off drugs they are content to add to their drug regimen. Go figure.

Friends With Benefits: An Accurate Term?

Tuesday, February 24, 2009


Friends With Benefits (Is there such a thing as Friends Without ...). We all know what it means. But just what exactly are the benefits?
a partial list of them would be:
(1.) The person is not calling you 24/7 wondering where you are.
(2.) You don't have to worry about meeting the person's parents. Ever.
(3.) You can hang out with who you please (perhaps another FWB?) without accountability.
(4.) Money aint a thang: Everything is dutch, or if not, done with no strings attached.
That's about all i can think of off the top of my head, but after a while we realize that the "benefits" is really one benefit. But it's a big one. Sex. Unbridled, haggle-free Sex. (See chart, which is not mine btw)
Is that true?
 

2009 ·Popwife Blog by TNB