There is a great myth among American society that if a woman is full-grown, has a promising career and doesn't have at least one crumb-snatcher walking around then something is wrong.
The Bible even speaks shamefully of "the barren woman" who mourns her childless lot in life.
But do you agree? Is there anything wrong with being of age, no kids (and possibly no man?)
Many women, it is said, are in fact choosing this route as a means to broaden their horizons and not be tied down in their relative good health. Many just don't want children yet, or at all.
And many are being made to felt less than a woman for doing so.
How do you feel about it?
3 comments:
nothing is wrong. we all can't be angelina jolie and many don't want to be.
April 14, 2009 at 3:32 PMHa. Well said. OctoMom could learn a thing or two.
April 14, 2009 at 4:37 PMSure, there is nothing wrong with a woman being barren, but it is woman that will later on in life say that she wish she had someone in here life and wish that she had children so that she could pass things on to or to bring joy to her with their own children and carry on her legacy. For if she die alone, her legacy ends with her.
May 12, 2009 at 6:13 PMPost a Comment